Did it all begin with the un-Holy
Trinity of Real Estate agents, Financial Advisers and pseudo-science
consultants?
Part 1, Banks and Real Estate
A house was no longer a home, a place to
live and eventually own, it had become a real estate investment. Real Estate
agents insisted that a family or an individual should be able to live there and
make money at the same time through the unlimited appreciation in the value of
the house. In fact, you should probably sell that “investment” every year and
take out the profit so you can buy a bigger, more “profitable” place. Guess who
also benefited from all this movement in real estate?
People who bought houses grew to expect
big payoffs and soon hysteria was rampant in the real estate market. People
bought houses and condos and sold them weeks later at a profit. No one actually
lived in these places, at least not for long. Few people thought this was odd
or that it might not continue forever. People who bought houses and stayed in
them were chastised by their smarter friends for not turning a profit.
People who had been kept from
homeownership by the prejudicial practices of the banks got regulatory relief
at the same time mortgage sales became a matter of commissions and not the prevue
of a salaried bank loan officer. The hysteria, to make commissions and peddle
mortgages from back alleys, took off and again no one seemed to notice the
danger. People who clearly could not continue to pay a certain monthly bill
were assured that they could so the mortgage broker would make a commission and
disappear. Others were sold mortgages at one price only to learn that bill
would increase beyond their reach shortly. No one cared.
When this buying and selling for an
instant profit stopped being possible and houses went back to being places you
paid for to shelter you and your family from the elements, real estate people
declared it a “collapse” because housing prices were no longer expanding
exponentially. As the price of houses returned to a less hysterical level, the banks
promptly blamed big government for that adjustment, certainly not their
practices, or the wild over building and demanded that everyone be saved by the
taxpayers. The home owners who were sold a bill of goods could just go to hell
as far as they were concerned. After all, those home owners took a risk, which
they were assured wasn’t a risk at all, and they lost. The realtors and their
banks were too big to lose anything.
Next, hysterical people were told that
they must immediately abandon their homes if some appraiser declared the
property to be worth less than they had paid for it. Why? At the time they
bought it they thought the price was fine. If they continue to live there and
pay for it, might it not someday in the future be worth what they paid for it?
Even if the value never makes it all the way back to what they paid for it,
what about deducting the cost of living in the place all those years? Isn’t shelter
worth something? But that’s different than an investment. My car was worth less
than I paid for it the moment I drove it off the dealer’s lot but I didn’t stop
making the payments.
Of course, folks who had to sell and
move for other reasons were screwed. They had to take a loss and move on or
abandon the property.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Be kind. I'm so old a snide comment might be the end of me!